Foundations for Revising Networks of Ontologies
نویسنده
چکیده
The framework of belief revision has been studied for years in the context of logic theories. It has been considered several times for description logics and more recently for aligned ontologies. We consider more generally the problem of revising a network of ontologies: given a set of ontologies connected by alignments, how to evolve them such that they account for new information, i.e., new formulas or correspondences. Revision is a typical problem of the semantic web due to its open nature. There are two extreme ways to approach this problem: on the one hand, transforming the network of ontologies in a single logic theory and applying classical revision; on the other hand, applying revision locally to each ontology and to each alignment and communicating the changes to related elements. We keep a middle term between these two approaches: local revision alone is not sufficient to revise networks of ontologies but preserving the separation of ontologies and alignments can be exploited by revision. We first use existing semantics of networks of ontologies for defining the notions of closure and consistency for networks of ontologies. Inconsistency can come from two different sources: local inconsistency in a particular ontology or alignment, and global inconsistency between them. Revision, in turn, can affect any of these components: retracting assertions from closed ontologies, like in classical belief revision, or correspondences from closed alignments, like in current alignment repair. Then, we define revision postulates for networks of ontologies and we show that revision cannot be simply based on local revision operators on both ontologies and alignments: they may fail to reach a consistent network of ontologies although solutions exist. We define a global revision operator by adapting the partial meet revision framework to networks of ontologies. We show that it indeed satisfies the revision postulates. Finally, we discuss strategies based on network characteristics for designing concrete revision operators.
منابع مشابه
OntoRevision: A Plug-in System for Ontology Revision in Protégé
Ontologies have been widely used in advanced information systems. However, it has been a challenging issue in ontology engineering to efficiently revise ontologies as new information becomes available. A novel method of revising ontologies has been proposed recently by Wang et al. However, related algorithms have not been implemented yet. In this article we describe an implementation of these a...
متن کاملبررسی هستان شناسی های توسعه یافته مبتنی بر اصول هستان شناسی های منبع باز زیست پزشکی
Background and Aim: Ontologies facilitate data integration, exchange, searching and querying. Open Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry is a solution for creating reference ontologies. In this foundry, the design of ontologies is based on established principles which allow for their interactions as a single system. The purpose of this study is to determine the main features of ontologies develop...
متن کاملThe Ontology Revision
An ontology consists of a set of concepts, a set of constraints imposing on instances of concepts, and the subsumption relation. It is assumed that an ontology is a tree under the subsumption relation between concepts. To preserve structural properties of ontologies, the ontology revision is not only contracting ontologies by discarding statements inconsistent with a revising statement, but als...
متن کاملBearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations on Cohesionless Soils: A Random Forest Based Approach
Determining the ultimate bearing capacity (UBC) is vital for design of shallow foundations. Recently, soft computing methods (i.e. artificial neural networks and support vector machines) have been used for this purpose. In this paper, Random Forest (RF) is utilized as a tree-based ensemble classifier for predicting the UBC of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils. The inputs of model are wi...
متن کاملTable of Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Early Ideas 2 2.1 First Thoughts about Combinatory Logic 2 2.2 Creative Foundations 3 2.3 Well-founded Ontologies 3 2.4 Stealing Strength 3 3 Non-well Founded Set Theories
An informal sketch of the development of my ideas about non wellfounded ontologies for the foundations of mathematics.
متن کامل